Entries in Electricity (12)
PNM Stock Tumbles 7 Percent in One Day
Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 11:52PM
Shares of PNM Resources, the holding company that owns the subsidiary that provides electricity to Santa Fe and Albuquerque, tumbled more than 7 percent today to close at just $9.63 per share. A number of electric utilities are taking a bath on Wall Street, in part due to their heavy reliance on credit markets that are now “clogged” because of “troubled assets”. But PNM’s stock has been falling for a year and a half, and has lost 70 percent of its value since its high of $32.55 just 18 months ago. The company is also undergoing an investigation by the New Mexico Environment Department after a reported release of fly-ash at the San Juan Generating Station in Waterflow.
Although the falling stock price is undoubtedly hurting some New Mexico residents who invested in PNM Resources, the bulk of the stock is held by global investment funds. The largest voting stake is held by Bill Gates, who owns about 9 percent of the company. Other funds, including the trillion-dollar Barclays Global, have smaller stakes. Investment funds have a singular purpose, which is to make piles of money into larger piles of money, and they seemed to be pretty good at it – at least until recently.
The meltdown on Wall Street will increase the cost of capital for the $1.3 billion in projects that PNM is planning over the next five years. Those higher costs will flow through to ratepayers, while PNM will reap a guaranteed 10.1 percent return on the investment. As a first step in paying for the projects, PNM filed for a rate increase of $123 million, to take effect next year, which would raise rates by 18 percent. Residential customers would see an increase in their bills of about 23.5 percent. These increases will be on top of this year’s two rate increases: PNM was awarded a $33 million increase in April, and in May they were given the right to raise rates as needed, without public hearings, to cover increases in their fuel costs. This allowance is expected to cost ratepayers an additional $62 million a year.
Could it be time to consider an alternative energy supply for Santa Fe?
Electricity for Santa Fe’s Water Supply
Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 11:47PM
Santa Fe recently announced their intention to award PNM a contract for the 27 million kilowatt-hours of electricity needed per year to pump drinking water from the planned Buckman Direct Diversion to Santa Fe. Were the operating cost estimates for this system calculated using last years electricity price, this years price, or next years? What escalation rate for electricity prices was used in the forward projection of costs? Based on the recent and proposed rate hikes, an increase of 17.5 percent per year may be reasonable. Will the proposed 9.5 percent per year increase in water rates be enough to cover that?
Norm Guame, the City’s consultant on the project, said that alternatives to awarding PNM the electricity contract were unfeasible, risky, and uncertain.
Does is seem odd that our least risky alternative is to entrust our drinking water supply to a company with a plummeting stock price, that is owned by global investment firms, that has raised rates by 17 percent this year and is seeking another 18 percent hike next year, and that is under investigation by the State Environment Department?
Could it be time to consider an alternative energy supply for Santa Fe?
PNM Wants a Rate Increase...Again
Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 01:45PM
Now that the 5-year moratorium on increasing electricity rates has ended, PNM has filed for one rate increase after the next. The New Mexico Public Regulation Commission (PRC) approved a $33 million rate increase for PNM in April – then tripled the award to around $100 million after PNM protested that the increase was too small. This week, the utility filed a request for another $123 million on top of that, which will raise residential electricity bills by another 23.5 percent next year if approved.
In addition to the rate increases granted by the PRC, PNM was awarded the right to raise its rates as needed to cover increases in their fuel costs.
Ratepayers should not only expect PNM’s new rate request to be granted, they should expect similar rate increases every year for awhile as PNM works to recover the $1.3 billion it plans to spend on its system over then next five years.
Wisconsin Task Force Recommends Feed-In Tariffs
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 09:49PM
A report by the Wisconsin Governor’s Task Force on Global Warming has recommended implementation of Feed-in Tariffs – the same policy mechanism that has successfully spurred rapid growth of renewable energy in Spain, Germany, and elsewhere. Feed-In Tariffs have become commonplace in Europe, but the report represents the first time an advisory committee to a U.S. governor has formally recommended the policy. Under the recommendation, generators of renewable energy would be paid a premium rate for the energy they produce, in recognition of the system-wide benefits created by diversification of the electric supply. The Wisconsin task force has recommended that the tariff system be set up such that it ensures generators receive financial returns comparable to the returns allowed utilities, and that those returns be guaranteed over a period that ensures full recovery of costs.






